Comparison of masticatory efficiency, patient satisfaction for single, two, and three implants supported overdenture in the same patient: A pilot study
Identifieur interne : 000714 ( Pmc/Curation ); précédent : 000713; suivant : 000715Comparison of masticatory efficiency, patient satisfaction for single, two, and three implants supported overdenture in the same patient: A pilot study
Auteurs : Srinidhi Bhat [Inde] ; Ramesh Chowdhary [Inde] ; Sudhindra Mahoorkar [Inde]Source :
- The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society [ 0972-4052 ] ; 2016.
Abstract
Over 30% of the world population suffers from edentulism. Implant supported overdenture have been a relatively successful treatment option for edentulism and have shown to slowed the rate of residual resorption and maintain the vertical height of the residual.
The purpose of this study was to measure patient masticatary efficiency and satisfaction with the mandibular one-, two-, and three-implant-retained overdenture therapy when compared with conventional denture in a the same patients.
Ten complete edentulous patients, who were wearing conventional complete dentures, were involved in this study. Three single piece endosseous implant of 3.0 mm in diameter and 13 mm in length were surgically placed in the mandible in the region of B, C, and D. Mandibular denture was connected for single, two, and three implant supported overdenture periodically and checked for masticatory efficiency using a bite gauge and patient satisfaction using a questionnaire.
Statistical analysis was done using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Four groups of bite forces when compared to each other. Group 1 was compared with Group 2, with the statistical value showing significance. Signed rank test showed no significance (0.268) when Group 2 was compared with Group 3. When Group 3 was compared with Group 4, and Group 1 compared with Group 4, rank test showed significant values. Four groups were compared with each other for patient satisfaction, Group 1 was compared with Group 2, with the statistical value showing no significance.
A single midline implant supported overdenture can be considered as a suitable and cost-effective treatment option over conventional denture. The study concludes that masticatory efficiency of this single midline implant supported overdenture is better than the conventional complete denture.
Url:
DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.176522
PubMed: 27141169
PubMed Central: 4837769
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
- to stream Pmc, to step Corpus: Pour aller vers cette notice dans l'étape Curation :000714
Links to Exploration step
PMC:4837769Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Comparison of masticatory efficiency, patient satisfaction for single, two, and three implants supported overdenture in the same patient: A pilot study</title><author><name sortKey="Bhat, Srinidhi" sort="Bhat, Srinidhi" uniqKey="Bhat S" first="Srinidhi" last="Bhat">Srinidhi Bhat</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, Karnataka</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chowdhary, Ramesh" sort="Chowdhary, Ramesh" uniqKey="Chowdhary R" first="Ramesh" last="Chowdhary">Ramesh Chowdhary</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff2">Branemark Osseointegration Centre India, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Branemark Osseointegration Centre India, Gulbarga, Karnataka</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mahoorkar, Sudhindra" sort="Mahoorkar, Sudhindra" uniqKey="Mahoorkar S" first="Sudhindra" last="Mahoorkar">Sudhindra Mahoorkar</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, Karnataka</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PMC</idno><idno type="pmid">27141169</idno><idno type="pmc">4837769</idno><idno type="url">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4837769</idno><idno type="RBID">PMC:4837769</idno><idno type="doi">10.4103/0972-4052.176522</idno><date when="2016">2016</date><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Corpus">000714</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PMC">000714</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Pmc/Curation">000714</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Pmc" wicri:step="Curation">000714</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en" level="a" type="main">Comparison of masticatory efficiency, patient satisfaction for single, two, and three implants supported overdenture in the same patient: A pilot study</title><author><name sortKey="Bhat, Srinidhi" sort="Bhat, Srinidhi" uniqKey="Bhat S" first="Srinidhi" last="Bhat">Srinidhi Bhat</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, Karnataka</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Chowdhary, Ramesh" sort="Chowdhary, Ramesh" uniqKey="Chowdhary R" first="Ramesh" last="Chowdhary">Ramesh Chowdhary</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff2">Branemark Osseointegration Centre India, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Branemark Osseointegration Centre India, Gulbarga, Karnataka</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Mahoorkar, Sudhindra" sort="Mahoorkar, Sudhindra" uniqKey="Mahoorkar S" first="Sudhindra" last="Mahoorkar">Sudhindra Mahoorkar</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:aff id="aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India</nlm:aff><country xml:lang="fr">Inde</country><wicri:regionArea>Department of Prosthodontics, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, Karnataka</wicri:regionArea></affiliation></author></analytic><series><title level="j">The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society</title><idno type="ISSN">0972-4052</idno><idno type="eISSN">1998-4057</idno><imprint><date when="2016">2016</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><sec id="st1"><title>Statement of Problem:</title><p>Over 30% of the world population suffers from edentulism. Implant supported overdenture have been a relatively successful treatment option for edentulism and have shown to slowed the rate of residual resorption and maintain the vertical height of the residual.</p></sec><sec id="st2"><title>Purpose:</title><p>The purpose of this study was to measure patient masticatary efficiency and satisfaction with the mandibular one-, two-, and three-implant-retained overdenture therapy when compared with conventional denture in a the same patients.</p></sec><sec id="st3"><title>Materials and Methods:</title><p>Ten complete edentulous patients, who were wearing conventional complete dentures, were involved in this study. Three single piece endosseous implant of 3.0 mm in diameter and 13 mm in length were surgically placed in the mandible in the region of B, C, and D. Mandibular denture was connected for single, two, and three implant supported overdenture periodically and checked for masticatory efficiency using a bite gauge and patient satisfaction using a questionnaire.</p></sec><sec id="st4"><title>Results:</title><p>Statistical analysis was done using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Four groups of bite forces when compared to each other. Group 1 was compared with Group 2, with the statistical value showing significance. Signed rank test showed no significance (0.268) when Group 2 was compared with Group 3. When Group 3 was compared with Group 4, and Group 1 compared with Group 4, rank test showed significant values. Four groups were compared with each other for patient satisfaction, Group 1 was compared with Group 2, with the statistical value showing no significance.</p></sec><sec id="st5"><title>Conclusions:</title><p>A single midline implant supported overdenture can be considered as a suitable and cost-effective treatment option over conventional denture. The study concludes that masticatory efficiency of this single midline implant supported overdenture is better than the conventional complete denture.</p></sec></div></front><back><div1 type="bibliography"><listBibl><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Mericske Stern, Rd" uniqKey="Mericske Stern R">RD Mericske-Stern</name></author><author><name sortKey="Taylor, Td" uniqKey="Taylor T">TD Taylor</name></author><author><name sortKey="Belser, U" uniqKey="Belser U">U Belser</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Shah, N" uniqKey="Shah N">N Shah</name></author><author><name sortKey="Parkash, H" uniqKey="Parkash H">H Parkash</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sunderam, Kr" uniqKey="Sunderam K">KR Sunderam</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Hutton, B" uniqKey="Hutton B">B Hutton</name></author><author><name sortKey="Feine, J" uniqKey="Feine J">J Feine</name></author><author><name sortKey="Morais, J" uniqKey="Morais J">J Morais</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Chen, L" uniqKey="Chen L">L Chen</name></author><author><name sortKey="Xie, Q" uniqKey="Xie Q">Q Xie</name></author><author><name sortKey="Feng, H" uniqKey="Feng H">H Feng</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lin, Y" uniqKey="Lin Y">Y Lin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Li, J" uniqKey="Li J">J Li</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Ando, T" uniqKey="Ando T">T Ando</name></author><author><name sortKey="Maeda, Y" uniqKey="Maeda Y">Y Maeda</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wada, M" uniqKey="Wada M">M Wada</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gonda, T" uniqKey="Gonda T">T Gonda</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Thomason, Jm" uniqKey="Thomason J">JM Thomason</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kelly, Sa" uniqKey="Kelly S">SA Kelly</name></author><author><name sortKey="Bendkowski, A" uniqKey="Bendkowski A">A Bendkowski</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ellis, Js" uniqKey="Ellis J">JS Ellis</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Thomason, Jm" uniqKey="Thomason J">JM Thomason</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Feine, Js" uniqKey="Feine J">JS Feine</name></author><author><name sortKey="Carlsson, Ge" uniqKey="Carlsson G">GE Carlsson</name></author><author><name sortKey="Awad, Ma" uniqKey="Awad M">MA Awad</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chehade, A" uniqKey="Chehade A">A Chehade</name></author><author><name sortKey="Duncan, Wj" uniqKey="Duncan W">WJ Duncan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gizani, S" uniqKey="Gizani S">S Gizani</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Thomason, Jm" uniqKey="Thomason J">JM Thomason</name></author><author><name sortKey="Feine, J" uniqKey="Feine J">J Feine</name></author><author><name sortKey="Exley, C" uniqKey="Exley C">C Exley</name></author><author><name sortKey="Moynihan, P" uniqKey="Moynihan P">P Moynihan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Muller, F" uniqKey="Muller F">F Müller</name></author><author><name sortKey="Naert, I" uniqKey="Naert I">I Naert</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Cheng, T" uniqKey="Cheng T">T Cheng</name></author><author><name sortKey="Sun, G" uniqKey="Sun G">G Sun</name></author><author><name sortKey="Huo, J" uniqKey="Huo J">J Huo</name></author><author><name sortKey="He, X" uniqKey="He X">X He</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wang, Y" uniqKey="Wang Y">Y Wang</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ren, Yf" uniqKey="Ren Y">YF Ren</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Harder, S" uniqKey="Harder S">S Harder</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wolfart, S" uniqKey="Wolfart S">S Wolfart</name></author><author><name sortKey="Egert, C" uniqKey="Egert C">C Egert</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kern, M" uniqKey="Kern M">M Kern</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Geertman, Me" uniqKey="Geertman M">ME Geertman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Boerrigter, Em" uniqKey="Boerrigter E">EM Boerrigter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Waas, Ma" uniqKey="Van Waas M">MA van Waas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Van Oort, Rp" uniqKey="Van Oort R">RP van Oort</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="N Rhi, To" uniqKey="N Rhi T">TO Närhi</name></author><author><name sortKey="Geertman, Me" uniqKey="Geertman M">ME Geertman</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hevinga, M" uniqKey="Hevinga M">M Hevinga</name></author><author><name sortKey="Abdo, H" uniqKey="Abdo H">H Abdo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kalk, W" uniqKey="Kalk W">W Kalk</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Thomason, Jm" uniqKey="Thomason J">JM Thomason</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lund, Jp" uniqKey="Lund J">JP Lund</name></author><author><name sortKey="Chehade, A" uniqKey="Chehade A">A Chehade</name></author><author><name sortKey="Feine, Js" uniqKey="Feine J">JS Feine</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Kordatzis, K" uniqKey="Kordatzis K">K Kordatzis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wright, Ps" uniqKey="Wright P">PS Wright</name></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Hj" uniqKey="Meijer H">HJ Meijer</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Kimoto, K" uniqKey="Kimoto K">K Kimoto</name></author><author><name sortKey="Garrett, Nr" uniqKey="Garrett N">NR Garrett</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Palmqvist, S" uniqKey="Palmqvist S">S Palmqvist</name></author><author><name sortKey="Owall, B" uniqKey="Owall B">B Owall</name></author><author><name sortKey="Schou, S" uniqKey="Schou S">S Schou</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Fueki, K" uniqKey="Fueki K">K Fueki</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kimoto, K" uniqKey="Kimoto K">K Kimoto</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ogawa, T" uniqKey="Ogawa T">T Ogawa</name></author><author><name sortKey="Garrett, Nr" uniqKey="Garrett N">NR Garrett</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Walton, Jn" uniqKey="Walton J">JN Walton</name></author><author><name sortKey="Glick, N" uniqKey="Glick N">N Glick</name></author><author><name sortKey="Macentee, Mi" uniqKey="Macentee M">MI Macentee</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Stellingsma, K" uniqKey="Stellingsma K">K Stellingsma</name></author><author><name sortKey="Slagter, Ap" uniqKey="Slagter A">AP Slagter</name></author><author><name sortKey="Stegenga, B" uniqKey="Stegenga B">B Stegenga</name></author><author><name sortKey="Raghoebar, Gm" uniqKey="Raghoebar G">GM Raghoebar</name></author><author><name sortKey="Meijer, Hj" uniqKey="Meijer H">HJ Meijer</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Kuoppala, R" uniqKey="Kuoppala R">R Kuoppala</name></author><author><name sortKey="N P Nkangas, R" uniqKey="N P Nkangas R">R Näpänkangas</name></author><author><name sortKey="Raustia, A" uniqKey="Raustia A">A Raustia</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Cakir, O" uniqKey="Cakir O">O Cakir</name></author><author><name sortKey="Kazancioglu, Ho" uniqKey="Kazancioglu H">HO Kazancioglu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Celik, G" uniqKey="Celik G">G Celik</name></author><author><name sortKey="Deger, S" uniqKey="Deger S">S Deger</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ak, G" uniqKey="Ak G">G Ak</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Hamdan, Nm" uniqKey="Hamdan N">NM Hamdan</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gray Donald, K" uniqKey="Gray Donald K">K Gray-Donald</name></author><author><name sortKey="Awad, Ma" uniqKey="Awad M">MA Awad</name></author><author><name sortKey="Johnson Down, L" uniqKey="Johnson Down L">L Johnson-Down</name></author><author><name sortKey="Wollin, S" uniqKey="Wollin S">S Wollin</name></author><author><name sortKey="Feine, Js" uniqKey="Feine J">JS Feine</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Kronstrom, M" uniqKey="Kronstrom M">M Kronstrom</name></author><author><name sortKey="Davis, B" uniqKey="Davis B">B Davis</name></author><author><name sortKey="Loney, R" uniqKey="Loney R">R Loney</name></author><author><name sortKey="Gerrow, J" uniqKey="Gerrow J">J Gerrow</name></author><author><name sortKey="Hollender, L" uniqKey="Hollender L">L Hollender</name></author></analytic></biblStruct><biblStruct><analytic><author><name sortKey="Alsabeeha, Nh" uniqKey="Alsabeeha N">NH Alsabeeha</name></author><author><name sortKey="Swain, Mv" uniqKey="Swain M">MV Swain</name></author><author><name sortKey="Payne, Ag" uniqKey="Payne A">AG Payne</name></author></analytic></biblStruct></listBibl></div1></back></TEI><pmc article-type="research-article"><pmc-dir>properties open_access</pmc-dir>
<front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Indian Prosthodont Soc</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="iso-abbrev">J Indian Prosthodont Soc</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JIPS</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>The Journal of the Indian Prosthodontic Society</journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">0972-4052</issn><issn pub-type="epub">1998-4057</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd</publisher-name><publisher-loc>India</publisher-loc></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="pmid">27141169</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="pmc">4837769</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JIPS-16-182</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4103/0972-4052.176522</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Original Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Comparison of masticatory efficiency, patient satisfaction for single, two, and three implants supported overdenture in the same patient: A pilot study</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Bhat</surname><given-names>Srinidhi</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Chowdhary</surname><given-names>Ramesh</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">1</xref><xref ref-type="corresp" rid="cor1"></xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name><surname>Mahoorkar</surname><given-names>Sudhindra</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"></xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1">Department of Prosthodontics, S. Nijalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India</aff><aff id="aff2"><label>1</label>Branemark Osseointegration Centre India, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India</aff><author-notes><corresp id="cor1"><bold>Address for correspondence:</bold> Dr. Ramesh Chowdhary, Branemark Osseointegration Centre India, Golden Plaza Complex, Court Road, Gulbarga - 585 102, Karnataka, India. E-mail: <email xlink:href="drramc@yahoo.com">drramc@yahoo.com</email></corresp></author-notes><pub-date pub-type="ppub"><season>Apr-Jun</season><year>2016</year></pub-date><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>182</fpage><lpage>186</lpage><history><date date-type="received"><day>24</day><month>8</month><year>2015</year></date><date date-type="accepted"><day>20</day><month>11</month><year>2015</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright: © The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2016</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0"><license-p>This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.</license-p></license></permissions><abstract><sec id="st1"><title>Statement of Problem:</title><p>Over 30% of the world population suffers from edentulism. Implant supported overdenture have been a relatively successful treatment option for edentulism and have shown to slowed the rate of residual resorption and maintain the vertical height of the residual.</p></sec><sec id="st2"><title>Purpose:</title><p>The purpose of this study was to measure patient masticatary efficiency and satisfaction with the mandibular one-, two-, and three-implant-retained overdenture therapy when compared with conventional denture in a the same patients.</p></sec><sec id="st3"><title>Materials and Methods:</title><p>Ten complete edentulous patients, who were wearing conventional complete dentures, were involved in this study. Three single piece endosseous implant of 3.0 mm in diameter and 13 mm in length were surgically placed in the mandible in the region of B, C, and D. Mandibular denture was connected for single, two, and three implant supported overdenture periodically and checked for masticatory efficiency using a bite gauge and patient satisfaction using a questionnaire.</p></sec><sec id="st4"><title>Results:</title><p>Statistical analysis was done using Wilcoxon signed rank test. Four groups of bite forces when compared to each other. Group 1 was compared with Group 2, with the statistical value showing significance. Signed rank test showed no significance (0.268) when Group 2 was compared with Group 3. When Group 3 was compared with Group 4, and Group 1 compared with Group 4, rank test showed significant values. Four groups were compared with each other for patient satisfaction, Group 1 was compared with Group 2, with the statistical value showing no significance.</p></sec><sec id="st5"><title>Conclusions:</title><p>A single midline implant supported overdenture can be considered as a suitable and cost-effective treatment option over conventional denture. The study concludes that masticatory efficiency of this single midline implant supported overdenture is better than the conventional complete denture.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>Implant</kwd><kwd>masticatory efficiency</kwd><kwd>overdenture</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front></pmc></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Wicri/Santé/explor/EdenteV2/Data/Pmc/Curation
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 000714 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd -nk 000714 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Wicri/Santé
|area= EdenteV2
|flux= Pmc
|étape= Curation
|type= RBID
|clé= PMC:4837769
|texte= Comparison of masticatory efficiency, patient satisfaction for single, two, and three implants supported overdenture in the same patient: A pilot study
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:27141169" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Pmc/Curation/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a EdenteV2
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.32. |  |